Overview
The Durham Doctor of Education (EdD) is a professional doctorate for leaders who generate knowledge from and for the field. Unlike a pure PhD that prioritises theory contribution for academic careers first and foremost, the EdD centres problems of practice: school and university improvement, learning design, equity and policy implementation. You will complete structured doctoral coursework, defend a research proposal, and produce a dissertation that is both scholarly and actionable. Supervision pairs research faculty with practitioners who understand institutional complexity.
Doctor of Education (EdD) is taught as one award, not a list of unrelated modules. The published length is 3–4 years, and the credit total is 54. Students move from Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education through Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education; Learning Sciences & Pedagogical Leadership; Education Policy, Equity & Systems Reform; Organisational Change in Education Settings; Ethics, Positionality & Professional Judgement; Improvement Science & Programme Evaluation, and finish on Doctoral Viva & Impact Dissemination.
Each course has a question, a method, and a submission. In this field, students design a short sequence for a named group of learners and the criteria that would mark it fairly. Reading is a curriculum extract, an assessment specification, and an evaluation summary. The artefact a marker expects is a plan with outcomes, a task, criteria, and a note on bias.
The award is built so that a graduate can do the following in practice: Frame and investigate problems of practice with doctoral rigour Apply mixed methods appropriate to educational settings Generate findings that change institutional practice and policy
Teaching assumes the student can read a source, attempt a problem before the seminar, and revise after feedback. Attendance at live seminars is part of the design. The capstone or final course must use the methods of the earlier courses; a project that ignores them does not pass.
This course does not confer a teaching licence, QTS, or equivalent registration.
The pages for each course name the topics that are examined. Those topics are the syllabus. A brochure line is not a substitute for them.
The EdD is assessed at doctoral standard. Viva voce examination and ethical research conduct match the Durham University's doctoral regulations. Ideal for heads, deans, system leaders, instructional designers and education policy professionals.
Who This Programme Is For
- ✦School and university leaders undertaking organisational improvement research
- ✦Policy professionals in education ministries and NGOs
- ✦Learning designers and EdTech leaders evidencing impact
- ✦Educators preparing for senior academic-practice hybrid careers
Faculty spotlight
Professor Alex Morgan leads learning-sciences supervision; Dr. Aisha Okonkwo specialises in equity and comparative education systems reform.
Programme Structure & Delivery
Coursework
Interactive modules, weekly readings, recorded and live seminars, and collaborative discussions with peers worldwide.
Assessment
Module assignments, proctored examinations, and capstone projects designed to demonstrate mastery of the field.
Learning Outcomes
- ✦Frame and investigate problems of practice with doctoral rigour
- ✦Apply mixed methods appropriate to educational settings
- ✦Generate findings that change institutional practice and policy
- ✦Lead evidence-informed improvement across complex education systems
- ✦Disseminate research to scholarly and professional audiences
Career Pathways
- ✦School Principal / System Leader
- ✦Dean / Director of Teaching & Learning
- ✦Education Policy Director
- ✦EdTech Research & Impact Lead
- ✦University Faculty (practice-oriented tracks)
Assessment
Modules are assessed through a published mix of coursework, applied projects, and examinations. Exam windows are announced in advance so students in other time zones are not forced into overnight sittings. Alternative arrangements are available where documented.
Curriculum
Year 1 — Professional Knowledge
EDD701Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education- EDD701-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education
- EDD701-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education
- EDD701-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education
- EDD701-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education
- EDD701-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education
- EDD701-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Education
3 creditsEDD702Learning Sciences & Pedagogical Leadership- EDD702-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Learning Sciences & Pedagogical Leadership
- EDD702-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Learning Sciences & Pedagogical Leadership
- EDD702-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Learning Sciences & Pedagogical Leadership
- EDD702-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Learning Sciences & Pedagogical Leadership
- EDD702-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Learning Sciences & Pedagogical Leadership
- EDD702-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Learning Sciences & Pedagogical Leadership
3 creditsEDD703Education Policy, Equity & Systems Reform- EDD703-M1 · Forum, rule, and parties — Education Policy, Equity & Systems Reform
- EDD703-M2 · Claim, counterclaim, and the facts that would change the result — Education Policy, Equity & Systems Reform
- EDD703-M3 · A clause, briefing, or policy note for a named audience — Education Policy, Equity & Systems Reform
- EDD703-M4 · Sources, revision, and the strength of the authority — Education Policy, Equity & Systems Reform
- EDD703-M5 · Institutions and the limit of the award — Education Policy, Equity & Systems Reform
- EDD703-M6 · A supervised paper: question, sources, argument, and defence — Education Policy, Equity & Systems Reform
3 creditsEDD704Organisational Change in Education Settings- EDD704-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Organisational Change in Education Settings
- EDD704-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Organisational Change in Education Settings
- EDD704-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Organisational Change in Education Settings
- EDD704-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Organisational Change in Education Settings
- EDD704-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Organisational Change in Education Settings
- EDD704-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Organisational Change in Education Settings
3 creditsEDD705Ethics, Positionality & Professional Judgement- EDD705-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Ethics, Positionality & Professional Judgement
- EDD705-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Ethics, Positionality & Professional Judgement
- EDD705-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Ethics, Positionality & Professional Judgement
- EDD705-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Ethics, Positionality & Professional Judgement
- EDD705-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Ethics, Positionality & Professional Judgement
- EDD705-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Ethics, Positionality & Professional Judgement
3 creditsEDD706Improvement Science & Programme Evaluation- EDD706-M1 · Statements: income, position, and cash — Improvement Science & Programme Evaluation
- EDD706-M2 · Recognition, ratios, and what the numbers cannot show — Improvement Science & Programme Evaluation
- EDD706-M3 · Cash flows, discount rates, and sensitivity — Improvement Science & Programme Evaluation
- EDD706-M4 · Market, credit, and operating risk — Improvement Science & Programme Evaluation
- EDD706-M5 · Controls, exceptions, and reporting — Improvement Science & Programme Evaluation
- EDD706-M6 · An investment or operating recommendation — Improvement Science & Programme Evaluation
3 creditsYear 2 — Research Methods & Candidacy
EDD711Qualitative Inquiry for Educational Practice- EDD711-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Qualitative Inquiry for Educational Practice
- EDD711-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Qualitative Inquiry for Educational Practice
- EDD711-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Qualitative Inquiry for Educational Practice
- EDD711-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Qualitative Inquiry for Educational Practice
- EDD711-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Qualitative Inquiry for Educational Practice
- EDD711-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Qualitative Inquiry for Educational Practice
3 creditsEDD712Quantitative Methods & Measurement in Education- EDD712-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Quantitative Methods & Measurement in Education
- EDD712-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Quantitative Methods & Measurement in Education
- EDD712-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Quantitative Methods & Measurement in Education
- EDD712-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Quantitative Methods & Measurement in Education
- EDD712-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Quantitative Methods & Measurement in Education
- EDD712-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Quantitative Methods & Measurement in Education
3 creditsEDD713Mixed Methods Research Design- EDD713-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Mixed Methods Research Design
- EDD713-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Mixed Methods Research Design
- EDD713-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Mixed Methods Research Design
- EDD713-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Mixed Methods Research Design
- EDD713-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Mixed Methods Research Design
- EDD713-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Mixed Methods Research Design
3 creditsEDD714Literature Synthesis & Research Proposal Writing- EDD714-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Literature Synthesis & Research Proposal Writing
- EDD714-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Literature Synthesis & Research Proposal Writing
- EDD714-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Literature Synthesis & Research Proposal Writing
- EDD714-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Literature Synthesis & Research Proposal Writing
- EDD714-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Literature Synthesis & Research Proposal Writing
- EDD714-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Literature Synthesis & Research Proposal Writing
3 creditsEDD801Doctoral Research Proposal Defence- EDD801-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Doctoral Research Proposal Defence
- EDD801-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Doctoral Research Proposal Defence
- EDD801-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Doctoral Research Proposal Defence
- EDD801-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Doctoral Research Proposal Defence
- EDD801-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Doctoral Research Proposal Defence
- EDD801-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Doctoral Research Proposal Defence
0 creditsYears 3–4 — Dissertation
EDD802Doctoral Dissertation Research- EDD802-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Doctoral Dissertation Research
- EDD802-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Doctoral Dissertation Research
- EDD802-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Doctoral Dissertation Research
- EDD802-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Doctoral Dissertation Research
- EDD802-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Doctoral Dissertation Research
- EDD802-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Doctoral Dissertation Research
24 creditsEDD803Doctoral Viva & Impact Dissemination- EDD803-M1 · Learners, outcomes, and a short teaching sequence — Doctoral Viva & Impact Dissemination
- EDD803-M2 · Task design, criteria, and a sample answer — Doctoral Viva & Impact Dissemination
- EDD803-M3 · Bias in assessment and how a criterion would be applied — Doctoral Viva & Impact Dissemination
- EDD803-M4 · A programme decision and its effect on students and staff — Doctoral Viva & Impact Dissemination
- EDD803-M5 · Evaluation evidence and what it cannot prove — Doctoral Viva & Impact Dissemination
- EDD803-M6 · A curriculum or evaluation brief — Doctoral Viva & Impact Dissemination
0 creditsAdmission requirements
Academic entry
- Master's degree in education or a related field from an accredited institution
- Minimum 3 years of professional experience in education, training, or organisational learning
English language
- English proficiency: IELTS 5.5 or equivalent
Documents
- Two professional and one academic reference
Research & interview
- Practice-oriented research proposal (1,500–2,000 words) addressing a problem of practice
- Admissions interview with the EdD programme directors
Programme questions
How long is the PhD Doctor of Education (EdD)?+
The published duration is 3–4 years. Teaching language: English. Actual time-to-complete depends on mode and any recognised prior learning.
Can I study this from my country?+
This is a fully online award. You study from your country. No student visa and no campus relocation are required.
What does it cost?+
Degree tuition for this award is published as £0 / tuition-free on the online pathway. Examination or administrative fees may apply at checkout — never an annual tuition invoice. Check the Fees page for any extras.
What are the entry requirements?+
Requirements are grouped on this page (academic, English, documents, research). Equivalent qualifications are considered. English may be waived after prior English-medium study.
How is the programme assessed?+
Assessment is typically a mix of coursework, projects, and examinations. Doctoral awards include a thesis or dissertation and an oral examination. Details sit in the programme specification and module outlines.
Will this award be recognised where I live?+
Recognition of the award for local employment, professional licence, or ministry attestation is decided by your employer or regulator. Durham University publishes verification pages for certificates. We do not claim automatic equivalence in every country.
How do I apply?+
Start an application on this website. Progress is saved from the first step. Admissions: admissions@durhm.co.uk.